"Welch" in sundry comments should be "Welsh", right? As in this blog.
2025-07-09 15:48:52
I think we could debate the merits of a policy in a civilised way, even if Trump favours it.
What, in my recollection, Marty found no sympathy for was the notion that voting for Trump might be a defensible action. Since Marty now hopes for, rather than expects, democratic elections, it seems that the rest of us were right in saying that it was not.
2025-07-08 12:30:46
I had a lot to say about the transgender issue and found myself very aligned with GftNC's point of view...
I mostly agree with GftNC's viewpoint, but didn't find time to write a carefully phrased comment when the question was live.
2025-07-08 12:28:16
Everyone's wrong about something, possibly including me. The question is whether they'll listen to reason.
2025-07-08 11:59:38
If this is a suggestion that we should have political shibboleths for commentators, I'm against it.
I don't mind discussing whether Trump lost the 2020 election - he plainly did, but I see no harm in demonstrating the fact in response to an honest enquiry.
2025-07-08 05:21:44
My long experience of writing to MPs is that, since word processors came into common use forty-odd years ago, one usually receives in reply a letter relevant to the general subject but not actually addressing one's points. Schumer's reply seems to be of that kind.
2025-07-07 06:08:25
"Expected" by who?
I might have expressed myself more precisely. I was merely discussing what I'm interested in reading.
2025-07-06 15:25:05
How much diversity are you, personally, willing to tolerate?
Anyone who's willing to engage in reasoned, fact-based, and tolerably polite discussion.
I see no problem with discussing religious perspectives, so long as we're not expected to follow arguments from scriptural authority. And I'm quite willing to read rational arguments for Trumpism, if any exist.
2025-07-05 04:56:01
I understand the ban on McKT under whatever name, but I'd like to see him back. I urge him to apologise to the powers-that-be for having accused them of holding malevolent beliefs which they do not, and I urge those powers then to rescind the ban.
"Welch" in sundry comments should be "Welsh", right? As in this blog.
I think we could debate the merits of a policy in a civilised way, even if Trump favours it.
What, in my recollection, Marty found no sympathy for was the notion that voting for Trump might be a defensible action. Since Marty now hopes for, rather than expects, democratic elections, it seems that the rest of us were right in saying that it was not.
I had a lot to say about the transgender issue and found myself very aligned with GftNC's point of view...
I mostly agree with GftNC's viewpoint, but didn't find time to write a carefully phrased comment when the question was live.
Everyone's wrong about something, possibly including me. The question is whether they'll listen to reason.
If this is a suggestion that we should have political shibboleths for commentators, I'm against it.
I don't mind discussing whether Trump lost the 2020 election - he plainly did, but I see no harm in demonstrating the fact in response to an honest enquiry.
My long experience of writing to MPs is that, since word processors came into common use forty-odd years ago, one usually receives in reply a letter relevant to the general subject but not actually addressing one's points. Schumer's reply seems to be of that kind.
"Expected" by who?
I might have expressed myself more precisely. I was merely discussing what I'm interested in reading.
How much diversity are you, personally, willing to tolerate?
Anyone who's willing to engage in reasoned, fact-based, and tolerably polite discussion.
I see no problem with discussing religious perspectives, so long as we're not expected to follow arguments from scriptural authority. And I'm quite willing to read rational arguments for Trumpism, if any exist.
I understand the ban on McKT under whatever name, but I'd like to see him back. I urge him to apologise to the powers-that-be for having accused them of holding malevolent beliefs which they do not, and I urge those powers then to rescind the ban.